During planning of a large migration for a customer, we needed to know what components was actually in use on certain types of pages. I chose to use Sitecore Powershell Extensions to extract that data.

You can find Sitecore Powershell Extensions here: https://marketplace.sitecore.net/en/Modules/Sitecore_PowerShell_console.aspx

Sitecore Powershell script to list Renderings

The components mentioned above was included on “article” pages through renderings, so what I needed to was create a script that looped through all pages of template type “article” and picked out all the items in “final renderings”.

I wanted to output this to a comma separated file where its easy to filter and sort on the data on the fly in excel.

Here is the script I ended up with:

write-host 'Running script...'
Set-Location master:\content #this was nessesary in my case, because the original "home" item was deleted and SPE had a bug (now fixed)
$pages = get-item master:\content\MySite\articles | get-childitem -Recurse | where-object { $_.TemplateName -match "Article" }
$device = Get-LayoutDevice -Default
$Results = @();
$DataPath = "C:\MySite\ComponentsInUse.csv"

foreach($page in $pages){

    $renderings = Get-Rendering -Item $page -Device $device -FinalLayout

    foreach($rendering in $renderings){

        if($rendering.ItemID -ne $null)
            $renderingItem = Get-Item master: -ID $rendering.ItemID
            if($renderingItem -ne $null)
                $Properties = @{
                    RenderingItemName = $renderingItem.Name
                    RenderingItemID = $renderingItem.ID
                    RenderingItemPath = $renderingItem.Paths.Path
                    UsedOnPage = $page.Name
                    UsedOnPageID = $page.ID
                    UsedOnPagePath = $page.Paths.Path

                $Results += New-Object psobject -Property $Properties


$Results | Select-Object RenderingItemName,RenderingItemID,RenderingItemPath,UsedOnPage,UsedOnPageID,UsedOnPagePath | Export-Csv -notypeinformation -Path $DataPath

write-host 'Script ended'

Useful Sitecore Powershell Extensions links

You can find a lot more useful Sitecore Powershell Extensions information on Adam Najmanowicz blog:




Thanks to Bill Dinger for this post: http://billdinger.blogspot.dk/2015/02/working-with-renderings-in-sitecore.html


Sitecore error: The item “/sitecore/content/Applications/WebEdit/WebEdit Texts” was not found. It may have been deleted by another user.

This is one of the more difficult errors I have had to pinpoint, so I hope this blogpost will help whoever might experience the same issue. Below is a screenshot of the error I got:

Webedit text not found

The stacktrace of the error

The above error message was suddenly starting to get thrown from Sitecore out of the blue, everytime I tried to edit a page in the experience editor.

I had not edited any code even remotely related to this and the item that is mentioned in the error message, was there. And everything was still working for the other members of my team. The error seemed to be isolated to my local enviroment.

After rebuilding the solution, rebuilding indexes, checking all of the code mentioned in the stacktrace, deleting everything and starting over, copying a solution from a collegue, checking .NET versions, IIS settings, etc. I was quite at a loss of what to do.


Chrome’s caching seems to be the culprit

A collegue suggested trying a different browser, than the Chrome I always use, even though this clearly is a serverside error, right?! I fired up firefox, and everything worked fine… So the error was localized to Chrome. I then deleted all the cache from Chrome, and the error disappeared.

Too much caching...

Grumpy cat goes smashing

The conclusion of all this shenanigans seems to be that Chrome’s caching algoritms might be too aggressive when using the Experience Editor.

Clear your browser cache!

Sitecore’s implementation of MVC

Sitecore’s implementation of .NET MVC is sometimes a bit quirky. Every now and then, I run into some strange behavior, such as this example. This I have met before, but a colleague of mine presented me with a very nice solution, which i wanted to share.

A submit to a Sitecore controller hits all methods

As i’m sure many Sitecore developers that uses MVC has experienced, if you have a submit button on a page, Sitecore calls all the public methods that returns an ActionResult, which of course can have unfortunate consequences and is a strange behavior to begin with.

There are some ways to mitigate this, such as wrapping the button in a Html.BeginForm and passing the controller name and desired method to hit along like this:

@using (Html.BeginForm("MyController", "MyActionResultMethod"))
  <input type="submit" value="Confirm" />

However, this causes Sitecore to only return the rendered output from the view that the controller returns. So if your controller only is responsible for a small part on the entire page, you only get the output from that controller. This is another strange behavior from Sitecore’s MVC implementation.

Implement a custom ActionNameSelectorAttribute

A colleague of mine at Pentia showed me a elegant solution, implementing a custom ActionNameSelectorAttribute. This allows me to map the ‘name’ attribute of the submit button to an ActionResult method name. This way I no longer need to specify the method name in the BeginForm, which means Sitecore now returns the entire page as intended. The code looks like this:

using System.Reflection;
using System.Web.Mvc;
public class HttpParamActionAttribute : ActionNameSelectorAttribute
  public override bool IsValidName(ControllerContext controllerContext, string actionName, MethodInfo methodInfo)
    if (actionName.Equals(methodInfo.Name, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase))
      return true;

    var request = controllerContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request;
    return request[methodInfo.Name] != null;

Now you need to add the name of the ActionResult method in your controller to the ‘name attribute of your button:

@using (Html.BeginForm())
  <input type="submit" name="MySubmitMethod" value="Confirm" />

And finally, your add the new attribute to your ActionResult method:

public ActionResult MySubmitMethod(…)

A nice solution to a quirky problem. Luckily Sitecore is reworking the MVC implementation. Hopefully it will be a bit more straight forward.

How many servers do I need to run Sitecore?

Warning: This post contains no code. But it does have very useful information for estimating Sitecore server setup size! 😉

The question above is frequently asked in a new Sitecore project. (Actually, if it isn’t, you should be worried). And there is no easy answer. It’s a bit like asking: “How big a house do I need?”.

The answer to both questions is “That depends”. (and no one is any wiser). Below I’ll list some of the things you need to consider, when trying to decide what kind and how big of a server setup you need. This won’t answer your question, but leave you with many more. However if you try to find some answers for those questions, you will be a lot better qualified for estimating your Sitecore server setup.

I will also provide a real world story to showcase a server setup that works for Sitecore and one that does not.

Sitecore’s minimum server setup

A while back I was starting up a new Sitecore project for a smaller client. They had a very tight budget and wanted real world advise for a minimum Sitecore Server Setup. They came from an older 6.0 Sitecore version with 1 Content Delivery Server (CD), 1 Content Management Server (CM) and 1 MSSQL server. 3 machines to run their (small) corporate website. There was also an integration to an older Dynamics AX server, containing ERM/CRM data. The client had around 5000 users, logging into the site 1-2 times a month (so quite a small site). The new site was a complete greenfield project (i.e. start from scratch) on Sitecore 8.0 (complete with Mongo, Solr, Analytics, etc.), and a reworked integration to Dynamics AX.

I asked around my colleagues at Pentia, to find some official recommendations from Sitecore or from other project we did at Pentia. And every time I asked the question, the answer was “That depends”, which of course it does. Part of the problem was that pretty much no one had done a Sitecore 8.0 project at that time and Sitecore 8.0 was a big change to Sitecore from previous versions. However, my colleague Thomas Stern (https://blog.istern.dk/), had gone through the same ordeal and had pieced together this diagram during meetings at Sitecore:


Sitecore minimum server setup

Sitecore minimum server setup


10 servers. 10. Sitecore recommends 10 servers to run a small business site. That would be a complete no-go for the client, which was used to having 3 servers to run their site. Granted, Sitecore has become a much larger beast in the later years and targets much larger clients now. But smaller clients, like this example, still exists and has bought a Sitecore license, which gives them access to newer Sitecore versions too. I think Sitecore might have forgotten that, in these recommendations.


My minimum Sitecore Server setup recommendations

So I set out to create our own minimum Sitecore server setup recommendations for this small type of client. I considered the following things, which you also should do, when planning your server setup:

  • The amount of users and page hits
    • The most obvious parameter when estimating server needs is how many page hits are you going to have. And this is quite important. So try to find out some how. If you have an old site, run some statistics for a while. If not, do some sort of analysis.
  • Proper, fast performing, well thought out code.
    • Even if you do not have that many page hits, you can still get a badly performing site. This is often due to bad code, which is very common. Your developer needs to know the pitfalls of Sitecore and how to avoid them, to do a properly performing site.
    • At Pentia we have done Sitecore development since Sitecore was created. And since Sitecore was created at Pentia, we know a lot about Sitecore! We know what not to do when coding Sitecore and what the pitfalls are. Therefor I know that our code will be very well tailored for Sitecore and perform well. This means that the client can do with less CD servers and less CM servers.
  • Downtime
    • The client  would be OK with brief periods of downtime during deployments and upgrades. This means that having a single CD server would be an option. Having 2 CD servers would enable you to take 1 server down for an upgrade while the site would still be running. Having only 1 server, saves cost, but means that the site will be down during upgrades. Some clients (mainly smaller clients) are perfectly OK with this.
    • The triple redundant Mongo server setup is way, way overkill for a small client. Yes, Mongo needs 3 servers to be able to do upgrades and restoring without downtime, but smaller clients may not need 100% uptime, if it means saving 2 servers.
  • Amount of usage of Solr Search
    • If the site in question don’t use search very much, you might not need a standalone Solr server. The site in question did you search a bit, but has so few users, that it does not really justify a standalone Solr server. However, if your site uses search or filtering on searches a lot, you might need a standalone Solr server.
  • Amount of use of Sitecore Reporting and Analytics
    • The client in question was not planning on using Sitecore reporting or analytics much, if at all, to begin with. They might later, but then there is the option of adding a Reporting or Analytics server at that time.
  • Amount of caching and interaction with other systems
    • Oftentimes, interaction with 3rd party services or other systems that provide data or communicate with your site, are able to slow your site down. The user cannot see that your site is waiting for Dynamics AX to finish a webservice call to get data or something similar. To the user, it’s your site that is slow. Therefore you might need to do a lot of caching of data from the 3rd party services and store them on your servers RAM. This directly affects the amount of RAM your server needs.
  • How many editors work simultaneously
    • If you have many editors working at the same time, you might need more than 1 CM server.

There are many more factors to consider and many aspects will be different in your site, but the above points will help you along.

Below is the setup I ended up recommending for this particular client. I kept the server scale (i.e. RAM and CPU) the same.

  • 1 dedicated CD server to serve content to the users
  • 1 SQL server that holds all databases
  • 1 CM server that also doubles as Solr, Reporting server and Analytics server.
  • 1 MongoDB.
My minimum Sitecore server setup

My minimum Sitecore server setup

So we went from a 10 server setup to a 4 server setup, which I’m relieved to see perform just fine, with muscles to spare for even more future users.

A too small Sitecore server setup

After a while, the client decided, by themselves, to try to scale the servers down, in an attempt to save money on hosting. They told their provider to cut the CPU and RAM by half on all servers. We found out, when they called us because the site was down.

This is what a CD server with 2 CPU’s and 7 GB of RAM looks like:


CPU is maxed out

CPU is maxed out

This resulted in a site that either did not respond, timed out or responded in around 50+ seconds on a simple frontpage. You can safely assume that the above 4 server setup, with half the CPU and RAM, is not enough to run a small Sitecore site with normal use of search, reporting and analytics.

Consider cloud hosting

You should also consider using cloud hosting, such as Azure, which the client in question used. The great advantage here is that they are able to add or remove servers extremely fast and throttle the servers up or down as needed. This is extremely versatile and should not be under valued. If your analysis of your hardware needs was wrong, you can relatively easily correct your mistakes in the cloud.

However, it comes with trade offs. Usually, when hosting in Azure, your hosting partner, if you even use one, has no clue what Sitecore is and will be completely unable to help with any Sitecore related tasks. Be it setup of windows services that Sitecore needs, knowing what Sitecore requires or tweaking the server for Sitecore etc. This means that you need to spend time and money on handling these things yourself or pay someone else to do it.

You also don’t necessarily know where in the world your data lives, which can violate local legislation in some countries.

Finally, it can become quite expensive to host a site, and corresponding test and pre-production sites, in the cloud. You absolutely need to do the math on this before you decide.

So, how many servers do you need to run Sitecore?

There are many factors to consider, as you can see. There are no simple answer to this. You need to do an analysis of you needs and your circumstances. Counsel your Sitecore partner and try to come up with an answer that suits your needs.


Serving any content on a non-secure line will slowly kill your business

Google is pushing for all websites to serve all content on a secure connection only, using HTTPS. Google are backing this currently, through up-ranking sites that are running on HTTPS only and downranking sites that are using all or even some HTTP (not secure). Read more about this here.

Sometime during 2016, Google are changing their browser Chrome, to make it harder to achieve the “Green Lock” icon, thereby ensuring higher security. If not all of your content, including scripts, images, adverts etc, is served on HTTPS, you will not get the “Green Lock” icon that users know, that indicates that the site is safe.

These changes translates into: If your website is not running HTTPS only, you will not be at the top of the list in Google searches and your users on Chrome could be scared to use your site.

Expect other browsers such as Edge, Internet explorer or Firefox to implement similar functionality soon.

A green lock icon is what you want

Chrome is going to classify your content in 3 groups: “Secure”, “insecure” and “mixed content”.

Secure means that all of the content on a page is served over a secure connection. This will give your page the pretty green lock icon seen below:

Green Lock Icon

The Green Lock Icon ensures your users that the page is secure


Insecure could mean that there is no https, that there is https but the certificate is invalid or compromised in some way, that there is insecure script from another site loaded on the page which is always blocked by chrome and a few other things. This will result in “The red slashy lock icon of doom” (Google’s own term, I swear!).


This is what your users will see if your connection is not secure


Mixed content means that some of the content is secure but other parts is not. This could be that the text is served on a secure line but the images are not.

An important change that Chrome is bringing is that Mixed Content is now considered unsafe and will not have the Green lock icon, thereby not appearing to be entirely safe. This is important to understand! Websites that might appear OK in Chrome today, might, when Chrome Version 48 is pushed, appear to be unsafe.

Https, but not safe

There is HTTPS, but some content is using HTTP. No Green Lock Icon


Google Chrome version 48 introduces the “Security Panel” which lets the user drill down into where the content is coming from. I will talk about this in a later post, to avoid being too technical in this one.

Why Google are pushing HTTPS

Google are pushing for all websites to use HTTPS for all content, simply to make the World Wide Web a safer place for everyone. As simple as that. The disadvantages of using HTTPS over HTTP, is now so small, that the advantages outweighs the disadvantages.

Advantages of HTTPS

Not using HTTPS means that it is possible to capture and read data sent from a server to a user. For example, this could be the “Session cookie” that the ASP.NET framework, which almost all Microsoft based website uses, could be captured and read by a hacker. This cookie contains a readable key which could enable a hacker to impersonate a user, thereby gaining access to the users information on the website or even allow the hacker to buy items on the users creditcard. Using HTTPS completely eliminates this threat and many others, by encrypting all data, sent to and from the user, including cookies.

There are other advantages, such as it makes it impossible for ISP’s or wifi providers to inject adverts into the datastream, which can look like you are heavily using adverts on your website, even though you might have an entirely advert free site.

Lastly, using HTTPS identifies your website, through the SSL certificate, as actually being your website and not some other site that might have captured the users request.

Disadvantages of HTTPS

The main disadvantages to why not the whole world are already using HTTPS is simple: Performance. There is a performace hit on using HTTPS as the server and the client has to perform a “TLS handshake” and share security information in order to be able to encrypt and decrypt the data. Also the encryption/decryption itself is a slight performace hit.

Most of the performace hit is in the handshake. Once the connection is established, the encryption itself does not have a very large impact. There are ways to fine tune this however.

There a some hard-to-kill myths about using HTTPS, which is debunked here: http://blog.httpwatch.com/2011/01/28/top-7-myths-about-https/

HTTPS becomes a requirement for HTML5 features in Chrome

Google Chrome is also going to require HTTPS to allow key HTML5 features to be available to the user and server. Features, such as using the users Camera, Microphone or even location data which many websites already use now to pinpoint the users location on some map oriented service, for example to guide the user to the nearest shop, will require full HTTPS. If your user’s security and privacy or your sites integrity does not convince you to serve HTTPS only, access to HTML5 features will.

How to handle the changes

First of all, don’t panic. Chrome version 48 is available now, but is not being pushed to users yet. So you do have time to create a battle plan.

What you need to do is to identify what changes are needed for your site to be able to run in HTTPS only. If you have a website that is already focusing heavily on security, you might not need to change anything. If you have a very simple site, you might get away with just flipping a HTTPS switch on your webserver.

But most likely you need to do an analysis of your website, to determine what action to take. Get started now, because the change for Chrome is coming and the change for Google search is already in effect.

More information

I will create more blogposts on the subject in the not too distant future, so make sure to subscribe to the blog and follow me on Twitter @Troels79.

For more in-depth information, please have a look at this presentation from Google: https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2015/12/security-panel


Lately I have been implementing an integration from Sitecore to Axapta to show and create membership data for a client we have at Pentia. The client had their Sitecore site developed by a different consulting firm and they didn’t do a very good job. Hence the client asked us to take over, sort it out and create the Axapta integration into the existing site. It is always a challenge to take over a site developed by someone with a different approach to standards, quality and software development as a whole. Often times you find bits a peaces where you go ‘wtf where they thinking?’…

Setting up a different device to return ajax in Sitecore

Anyway, I had a page displaying a searchresult with a “Show more” button at the bottom. This button did an ajax call to the same url, adding, amongst others, an “ajax=1” query parameter. I then had setup an ‘ajax’ device in Sitecore that picked up that parameter.

Ajax device

Setting up the ajax device. not the querystring parameter


Then I setup a layout with no other content that a contentregion and connected that to the item containing the searchresult. On the searchresult item there’s a ajax-returning control tied up on the ajax device.

Item setup for ajax

Item setup for ajax

This is a method I have used before and it works fine. Only, it didn’t on this site. Here it didn’t return ajax, it returned the entire page again, on the standard layout.

Check your web.config

I spent some time figuring out what was going on here. It seemed that Sitecore did not at all pickup on the querystring and didn’t change the layout. I spoke to my colleague Alan Coates who suggested to write a pipeline processor for debugging the device detection in the “httpRequestBegin” pipeline. Something he did a number of times, on other projects which we took over from other consultant firms. He promised to write a blogpost about it, which I will link to when ready.

Instead I went back to the solution in visual studio and starting searching for device related settings and properties. In the web.config, I found a “device” setting in the website node which was set to the device that it kept returning:

Sitecore Device setting overrides detection

Sitecore Device setting overrides detection



It turns out that this setting overrides Sitecores automatic device detection. After removing this setting, everything works as intended.



Please leave a “Like” and/or use the share buttons, if you found this guide usefull

Sitecore notification bar

A client had a request to have a warning in the page editor when the authors was editing a cloned item.

I wanted to add a bar below the ribbon to do this and found the notification bar which is excatly that. This is what the end result looked like:

Notification bar example

Notification bar example


The getPageEditorNotifications pipeline

To do this you simply do a pipeline processor that hooks into the ‘getPageEditorNotifications’ pipeline which you configure in web.config like this:

  <processor type="CodeBuildPlay.Pipelines.ItemIsCloneWarning, CodeBuildPlay.Cloning"/>

Then you make a public class with method name ‘Process’ that has the ‘Sitecore.Pipelines.GetPageEditorNotifications.GetPageEditorNotificationsArgs’ as an argument, and you are done! Simple!

This is my code:


public void Process(GetPageEditorNotificationsArgs args)
   Item item = args.ContextItem;
   if (item == null)

   if (!item.IsClone)

   string message = "Be aware that this item is a cloned item!";

   PageEditorNotification warning = new PageEditorNotification(message, PageEditorNotificationType.Warning);

      warning.Icon = "Applications/16x16/warning.png";


Read more about the notification bar here:



Please leave a “Like” and/or use the share buttons, if you found this guide usefull.

Sitecore tackled

Small posts about Sitecore and solutions

Cooking with Sitecore

Diary of my experience working on great CMS called Sitecore

Visions In Code

Never look back

Cook 4 Passion

Food food fooooood. We love fooooooooood !!!


Sitecore, Digital Marketing, Work, Life and so on...


Down the DLL Rabbit Hole


Arash Sarfehjou


Code and tweaks, mostly for Sitecore

Code and tweaks, mostly for Sitecore

The grumpy coder.

Code and tweaks, mostly for Sitecore

Alan Coates - Sitecore/.NET blog

Pushing Sitecore to the limits and beyond

Patrick Delancy

i write code


Målret driften af dit website

Kim Schioett's Sitecore, .net and webdev blog

An archive of solutions, ideas, and hard-earned knowledge

Laub plus Co

Code and tweaks, mostly for Sitecore

iStern Blog

A simple Code Blog

Brian Pedersen's Sitecore and .NET Blog

Sitecore, C#, ASP.NET for developers